Canonical Covariant Formulation of Green-Schwarz Superstring without Second Class Constraints

Preprint

SB/F/94-222

CANONICAL COVARIANT FORMULATION OF GREEN-SCHWARZ
SUPERSTRING WITHOUT SECOND CLASS CONSTRAINTS

A. Restuccia

and

J. Stephany

Universidad Simon Bolivar
Departamento de Fisica
Apartado Postal 89000, Caracas 1080- A
e-mail: stephany @usb.ve

Abstract

We describe a canonical covariant formulation of the Green-Schwarz Superstring which
allows the construction of a new covariant action canonically equivalent to the Green-
Schwarz action but subjected only to first class constraints. From this action the correct
BRST operator for the quantization of the Green-Schwarz Superstring may be con-
structed. Also the gauge fixed action in the Light-Cone gauge may be reobtained. The
action presented in this letter generalizes in a non-trivial form the action introduced by
Kallosh for the Brink-Schwarz-Casalbuoni Superparticle.

UNIVERSIDAD SIMON BOLIVAR

- 2 -

The advance in the development of Superstring theory has been delayed for some
time by the lack of an explicitly covariant quantization environment in which the second
quantized theory of interacting Superstrings could be discussed . For the Green-Schwarz
Superstring (GSS) [1] this problem reveals itself through the unsuccessful result of the var-
ious attempts to construct the correct BRST operator of the theory. The main difficulty is
related to the fact that the first class constraints associated to the local K-supersymmetry
[2] appear mixed with second class constraints in such a way that no local and Lorentz
covariant quantization of the system appears to be allowed [3]. On the other hand the
definite success of the light cone gauge approach for the computation of finite multiloop
amplitudes [4] reaffirm our expectations of having a theory of fundamental interactions in
terms of Superstrings. Moreover recent results for the bosonic case [5] renew our confi-
dence in the feasibility of a covariant second quantized Superstring theory once we have
constructed the correct BRST operator in the first quantized formulation.

The zero mode structure of GSS is described by the Brink-Schwarz and Casalbuoni
(BSCS) superparticle [6] which in particular has a constraint structure which is similar
to, although simpler, than the one of the GSS. After many attemps the correct BRST
operator for the BSCS was finally constructed in Ref.[7] in terms of an infinite set of
auxiliary fields. Later in Ref.[8] Kallosh was able to construct an action from which the
previously constructed BRST operator may be deduced. This resolves the problem for
the BSCS but regretfully this construction has no obvious generalization for the GSS.
Another approach to the BSCS using twistor variables may be found in Ref.[9] (see also
references in Ref.[10]). In a recent paper [10] we presented a canonical covariant approach
which, starting from the original BSCS action and by enlarging the phase space with the
introduction of appropriate auxiliary variables [11], allowed the construction of the action
presented by Kallosh in a systematic way. In this paper we present the generalization of
this approach to the GSS obtaining a local, Lorentz covariant action which generalizes
Kallosh action in a non-trivial way. From this action the correct BRST operator needed
for the quantization of the GSS could be obtained using standard methods. .

The Green-Schwarz action, for type IIB Superstring, [1] is given

S(x,0) =< L 1 + L 2 >

(la)

where

7r« = d a x» - ie ^d a e A

k A ^ a = ie A ^d a 6 A without sum A = 1, 2.

(lb)

Here 6 = 1,2, are 10-dim Majorana-Weyl spinors of the same chirality. We denote with
<> integration on the 2-dim world sheet variables r and a. The world sheet indices are a
and (3 while \x and v denote the 10-dim target space indices. Introducing r\ A and P M the

- 3 -

conjugate momenta to 9 A and x^ the canonical analysis [3] yields the constraints (using
primes to denote d a )

V>- = \(P lt -x lt , ) 2 -2r, 1 9 1 ',

<p+ = \(P»-x lt , ) 2 + 2r, 2 d 2 ', (2a)
which are first class and the constraints

F_ = r J 1 + i6 Y(P»
F+ = V 2 + tf^(P^

which are a mixture of first and second class
decomposed into first class contraints

and second class ones

F-T+ =

- < + fcjj = 0, (2b)
ones. The latter (2b) may be covariantly

(3a)

F+r_ = 0, (3b)

by using the following definitions and properties of the r + , T_ matrices

r_ = 7 ^(p /i -x; + 2^ CT )

r + = 7 ^(P M -x M / -2g CT ), (4)

r_r_ = 2H_i = 2(</?_ + 2F_^ 1 ')i
r + r + = 2H+i = 2((p+ - 2F + e 2 ')i
r_r + = r + r_ = 2(p 2 - x' 2 - 2a£ <t (p" - x v )+

+ 2fc; (J (P^ + ^)-4A ; ; f7 A ; 2 ^)l. (5)

Nevertheless ^+ and ip_ are infinite reducible constraints and this together with the fact
that (3b) are second class are the obstacles mentioned above to the quantization of the
system.

We observe that the — (+) constraints in (2) are associated to the left (right) moving
sector of the Superstring which decouple. In particular T_, F_, </?_, F_T_ commute,
under Poisson bracket, with r+, F+, tp+, -F+T-)-.

Following our strategy in Ref. 10 we are now going to extend the phase space in
order to eliminate the second class constraints. To this end we will construct in the
extended phase space a new dynamical system restricted only by first class constraints
such that with an admissible partial gauge fixing it reduces to the original system, with the
correct quantum measure [12]. The procedure starts, as in the case of the superparticle,
by constructing a new dynamical system S n , with n-stages of reducibility, canonically
equivalent to the GSS. Then we consider the limit n — > oo in a sense that will be precisely

-4-

defined and show that in this limit the new dynamical system contains only first class
constraints.

We are going to treat the left sector explicitly. The procedure for the right sector is
similar. We introduce the new canonical variables 771 and £1 and consider the extension of
F- given by

F-=F- + ^!. (6)

with

$i = 77i+f -wi, (7)
C-cui =<Ci(o>i(? )( 7) >~. (8)

Here <>^r denotes integration on a and the matrix uj\ = u>i(a, a) is independent of 77 and

We determine ui\ from the condition

{F_(a),F_(a)} = 0. (9)

The solution to this problem is given by

wi(<r,a) = -iT 8(a,a) - ^ 1 ^o'h»5(a,d)+

+ l(U*h^i(vh^(a,d), (10)

where T = T_ and £ = 1 .

It is a non trivial generalization of the solution uj = — ft 3 for the similar problem in
the case of the superparticle [10]. It depends not only on the original canonical variables
but also in the new one £1.

We now introduce the new geometrical object

$ 1 = r]l +^ l .W 1 , (11)
with W\ (a, a) is determined from the condition

{F_(<r),$(?)} = 0. (12)
There exists a solution to this equation given by

{tiirWtiPh^i*,*), (13)

which again is a generalization of the W\ = introduced for the analysis of the superpar-
ticle [10].

- 5 -

We now obtain the appropriate extension of the projectors (4). We define ri(cr)
through

{$((7),$(a)} = 2ir 1 ((7)«J( ( T,5). (14)

Ti(a) is then given by

F^a) = r (a) - di^&V + 2*(£ i7m £ 1 ')7 m (15)

satisfying

r^! = 2H!i,

Hi = ^(P M - ^ + 2*^ - 4z£ i7m £o') + 2i(^ l7 ^i')) 2 - (16)
The extension of <£>_ is then defined by

<p 1 = H 1 -2Q 1 (&-Q. (17)
It satisfies the following commutation relations

d

{<Pi(<r),<Pi(<r)} = 2(pi(<7) + ¥>i(ct))^<J(<7,ct)

{vi{a)M°) = -m°)^K°,°)

{cp 1 (a),F.(a)} = 0. (18)

The original set of constraints (2) is now reformulated in the extended phase space in the
following way

F_ = F_ + $i = (19a)
cp! = (19b)
Si = 0. (20)

Constraints (19) are first class, while (20) is still a mixture of first and second class con-
straints. The equations above correspond to the left moving sector, there is an analogous
set for the right moving sector.

The first class part of $i may be decoupled by considering

^i = (F_ + $i-8i)ri = 0, (21a)

$f = 8ir+ = o. (2ib)

which is are the generalizations of equations (3). We have then the constraints

F_ = 0, (22a)

if! = 0, (22b)

V>i = 0, (22c)

$J = 0. (23)

- 6 -

Again constraints (22) are first class while constraints (23) are second class. The constraints
ipi are infinite reducible. We may recover the original set of left moving constraints in (2)
by doing a partial gauge fixing. The reduction is performed by considering the partial
gauge fixing condition, associated to (22a),

X- = r+£i = (24a)
X T _ = m T+ = 0. (24b)

From (24) and (22) we obtain rji = 0, £i = 0. Eq.(22) then reduces exactly to the
left moving constraints in (2), (3). Moreover the reduction may also be obtained in the
functional integral, with the correct quantum measure [12]. The proof goes in the same
way as for the superparticle extension in [10].

Having constructed Si we may now proceed to obtain S n . We introduce

where

and
with

= rji + ^ ■ tui, i=l,---,n (25)

Wl ((7, a) = -OWfo a) - ^7 M (Ci - £_ 2 + • • • Qh^(a, a)+

+ \Gi(°)'fti@h^6(<r,2), (26)

ee m + & ■ w % (27)

Wi(a, a) = flWfo a) + - (frA^-i - £-2 + ' • • &)h^(<j, a)+

-(Wh^h^(a,a). (28)
We now introduce Ti(cr) generalizing (14) through the equation

{8 i ((7),8 i (ff)} = 2ir i ((7)<5(<7,a), (29)

which give

Tiia) = r^ia) - 4i(e i7 M(Ci-i - £-2 + • • • Q)Y + 2*(^7m£97 m - (30)
The expressions for H n and <p n are obtained from

1

2

Hn = \{P» ~x' n + 2fcJ CT - 4z(e n7M (^-i " C-2 + • ••&))+

+ 2^7mO) 2

v»„ = ^„-2$ n (e / n -e , „-i + ---e / )- (31)

-7-

Finally we consider

ijj n = ^ n r n ,

^ n = F- + $1 - 81 - $ 2 - $2 + $3 $n =

= f_ + ^(wi - w 1 ) - e 2 (^ 2 - w 2 ) + ■ • -LK - w n ).

The complete set of constraints associated to S n are

F_ + $1 =
81 + $2 =

(32a)
(32a)

n

The constraints (33) are first class with ip n infinite reducible while

■n 1 +

(33a)
(33b)
(33c)
(34)

(35)

are second class constraints. We note that the constraint (34) is equivalent to <E>^ = 0. We
may again recover the GSS in the original phase space restricted by the set of constraints
in (2) by doing a partial gauge fixing. The reduction is performed by considering the
following gauge fixing conditions, associated to (33a),

r+Ci =
r+6 =
r+6 =

r+£n =

r?ir+ =
r_£i =
r_£ 2 =

n-1

(36)

From (36) we obtain

6 = 0,
6 = 0,

Cn-l = 0,

T+^n = 0.

(37a)
(37b)

From the transverse projection of (33a), multiplying then by r + , and using (34) we get

T-fn = (38)

- 8 -

which together with (37b) yield

Hn = 0. (39)

From (33a) and (33c) we then obtain

Vi =

Vn = (40)

The system defined by S n , restricted by (33) and (34) then reduces to original system
subjected to the constraints in (2). The reduction in the functional integral, is performed
with the correct quantum measure [11] [12]. The generalization needed to include the right
moving sector presents no further complications.

The constrained system is determined from (33) taking n — > oo. The key point is
that in this limit there are only first class constraints. This can be shown by taking the
gauge fixing conditions

r + &+i = o , r_6 = o (4i)

which generalize (36). For any i > n, system Soo reduces to S n and hence is equivalent to
the original constrained system. Moreover one can show that in this gauge is satisfied
identically and that the algebra of the first class constraints (33) closes without further
restrictions. The action associated to may then be written in the form

S 00 <P lt x» + S-+S+ >, (42a)

oo

S ™ =< ^2 ViZi + ai Poc + I34>oo +

i=0

oo

+ > (42b)

i=0

where r]o = r), £o = 1 , &o = F- and is the analogous construction for the right
moving sector, in terms of new independent auxiliary fields. The system (42) is infinite
reducible as a consequence of the infinite reducibility of vpoo. The others constraints are
irreducible. 5+ is obtained from the expression of changing the sign of the terms with
a d a derivative.

We have thus constructed a new action given by (42) constrained only by first class
constraints which has the same degrees of freedom and is canonically equivalent to the
original Green-Schwarz action. This formulation is in terms of regular first class constraints
only allowing a consistent construction of the BRST charge with the right cohomology
for Superstring.The systems S n in our approach are still restricted by some second class
constraints which are needed in order to match the degrees of freedom of the Green-Schwarz
Superstring. In the limit n — > oo only first class constraints appear but we still obtain the
correct number of degrees of freedom. As in the superparticle case [10] the manipulation
of the infinite auxiliary fields as well as the infinite tower of ghosts for ghosts which appear
due to the infinite reducibility of the system, may require the introduction of generating

- 9 -

functions [14] . In this line of thought it is interesting to notice that gauge fixing conditions
which are equivalent for each one of the S n actions may be inequivalent in the n — > oo
limit.

References

[1] M. Green and J. Schwarz, Phys Lett 136B (1984) 367; Nucl Phys243 (1984) 475.

[2] W. Siegel, Phys Lett 128B (1983) 397.

[3] T. Hori and K. Kamimura, Prog Theor Phys 73 (1985) 476.

[4] A. Restuccia and J. G. Taylor, Int J of Mod Phys A8 (1993) 753; Phys Lett 282B

(1992) 377; Phys. Reports 174 (1989) 285; Preprint KCL (1993); P.diVechia et al
Nucl Phys B298 (1988) 527; E.D+Hoker and D.H.Phong Coram Math Phys 125
(1989) 469; S.Mandelstam Phys Lett B277 (1992) 82; N.Berkovits Nucl Phys B395

(1993) 77; Phys Lett B300 (1993) 53.

[5] B. Zwiebach Nucl Phys B390 (1993) 33.

[6] R.Casalbuoni Nuov Cim 33A (1976) 389; L. Brink and J. Schwarz, Phys Lett 100B
(1981) 310.

[7] E. Bergshoeff and R.Kallosh, Phys Lett B240 (1990) 105.
[8] R. Kallosh, Phys Lett B251 (1990) 134.

[9] Y Eisenberg and S.Solomon, Nuc Phys B309 (1988) 709; N.Berkovits, Nuc Phys
B350 (1991) 193; Y.Eisenberg, Preprint IASSNS-HEP-91/48, Princeton; E.Nissimov,
S.Pacheva and S.Solomon Nucl PhysBSVT (1989) 344.
[10] A. Restuccia and J.Stephany, Phys Rev D47 (1993) 3437.

[11] A. Restuccia and J.Stephany, Phys Lett 305B (1993) 348; R. Gianvittorio, A. Restuc-
cia and J.Stephany, Mod Phys Lett A6 (1991) 2121; I.Batalin and E.S.Fradkin, Nucl
Phys 279 (1987) 514. 131.

[12] G. Senjanovic, Ann Phys 100 (1976) 227.

[13] A. Restuccia and J.Stephany in preparation .

[14] A.Galperin et al, Class Quantum Grav 1 (1984) 469; I. Bars and R.Kallosh, Phys Lett
B233 (1989) 117; M.B.Green and C.M.Hull, Phys Lett B229 (1989) 215.